Excellence

Paul Newman died this past week.

The world knew him as a distinguished actor, a successful entrepreneur, a race car aficionado, and a philanthropist.

For several days following his death, his life was highlighted by a number of news and entertainment commentators on the radio and television.

What was most interesting to us was the playback of an old interview in which he explained his deep interest in car racing.  Newman explained that his fascination for race cars and track racing centered around his belief that "excellence" is clearly demonstrated by Winners of (car) racing events.  In other words, professional race car drivers who win major events clearly demonstrate excellence in their field.  That fascinated and intrigued Newman.

Being "competent" or "good" is NOT a display of excellence. 

Excellence is not a matter of ability, knowledge or practice.  It cannot be taught, imposed, or wished into existence.  Excellence is that trait that results in performance that surpasses what was previously possible - - it is a performance that oftentimes defies old limits and maps new territory.

This raises the question: How many lawyers do you know that truly display "excellence"?  or, "do YOU display "excellence" in YOUR role as a lawyer?"

We are acquainted with many lawyers who are quite competent, and considered good; but, we would not consider them to be "excellent" in their field. 

Obviously, defining excellence requires a high degree of subjectivity.  Like "beauty," it may be in the eyes of the beholder.  But, again, like beauty, we all know excellence when we see it.  And, when we do see it (in a lawyer), it is (like beauty), a thing to behold.